2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (89 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 325 kg more than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (179 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet Malibu 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass
Make Chevrolet Oldsmobile
Model Malibu Cutlass
Year Released 2004 1984
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3491 cc 2473 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 200 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 298 Nm 179 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 1495 kg 1170 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2640 mm