2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1985 Zastava 750

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (197 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1985 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1985 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 998 kg more than 1985 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1985 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (299 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Zastava 750. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1985 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1985 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: