2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1986 Holden Camira
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Camira would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1986 Holden Camira. (83 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 480 kg more than 1986 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Camira. (126 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Malibu | 1986 Holden Camira | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Malibu | Camira |
Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 126 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2580 mm |