2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1999 Acura CL
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Acura CL would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1999 Acura CL. (150 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1999 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura CL weights approximately 76 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Malibu.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Malibu | 1999 Acura CL | |
Make | Chevrolet | Acura |
Model | Malibu | CL |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 150 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1504 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 65 L |