2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2002 Ford Econoline

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 821 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Malibu.

Because 2002 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Econoline (338 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Malibu. (298 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Malibu.

Compare all specifications: