2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2011 Volvo V70
To start off, 2011 Volvo V70 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volvo V70 (232 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Malibu. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Malibu.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Volvo V70. (236 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Volvo V70.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Malibu | 2011 Volvo V70 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Malibu | V70 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 3192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 232 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 236 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.8 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 60 L |