2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1955 Fiat Campagnola
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (180 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1955 Fiat Campagnola. (39 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 1955 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1955 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (278 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Fiat Campagnola. (144 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Fiat Campagnola.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1955 Fiat Campagnola | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Monte Carlo | Campagnola |
Year Released | 2004 | 1955 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3392 cc | 2054 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 39 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 278 Nm | 144 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2260 mm |