2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1955 Riley RM A
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 282 kg more than 1955 Riley RM A.
Because 1955 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1955 Riley RM A | |
Make | Chevrolet | Riley |
Model | Monte Carlo | RM A |
Year Released | 2004 | 1955 |
Engine Size | 3392 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1236 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2870 mm |