2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1963 BMW 3200 CS

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 3200 CS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 3200 CS would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (180 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1963 BMW 3200 CS. (160 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 3200 CS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 18 kg more than 1963 BMW 3200 CS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 BMW 3200 CS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 3200 CS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (278 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 BMW 3200 CS. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 BMW 3200 CS.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo 1963 BMW 3200 CS
Make Chevrolet BMW
Model Monte Carlo 3200 CS
Year Released 2004 1963
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3392 cc 3169 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 180 HP 160 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 278 Nm 240 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1518 kg 1500 kg
Vehicle Length 5030 mm 4390 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1540 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2840 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 75 L