2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1975 Mazda 616
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (180 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1975 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 608 kg more than 1975 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (278 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda 616. (124 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1975 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Monte Carlo | 616 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3392 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 278 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 83 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2480 mm |
