2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1982 Fiat Argenta
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (305 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1982 Fiat Argenta | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
| Model | Monte Carlo | Argenta |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3786 cc | 1585 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 71.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 35 L |
