2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1995 Mazda 626
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (180 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 308 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (278 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (167 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1995 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Monte Carlo | 626 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3392 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 278 Nm | 167 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |