2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (295 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo S60 weights approximately 31 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo S60 (400 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. (305 Nm). This means 2002 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo has automatic transmission and 2002 Volvo S60 has manual transmission. 2002 Volvo S60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Monte Carlo | S60 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3786 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 295 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 93.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1571 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 70 L |
