2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2002 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (180 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 773 kg more than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2002 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Chevrolet | ZAZ |
| Model | Monte Carlo | Wagon |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3392 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 67 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2330 mm |
