2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2003 Daewoo Matiz

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Daewoo Matiz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Daewoo Matiz would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 715 kg more than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (305 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo has automatic transmission and 2003 Daewoo Matiz has manual transmission. 2003 Daewoo Matiz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo 2003 Daewoo Matiz
Make Chevrolet Daewoo
Model Monte Carlo Matiz
Year Released 2004 2003
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3786 cc 994 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 200 HP 63 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 305 Nm 87 Nm
Engine Bore Size 97 mm 68.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 67.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 9.3:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1540 kg 825 kg
Vehicle Length 5030 mm 3500 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1500 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2350 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 7.8 L/100km 5.3 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.8 L/100km 8.2 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.8 L/100km 6.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 38 L