2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2009 Lada Kalina

To start off, 2009 Lada Kalina is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (180 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2009 Lada Kalina. (58 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada Kalina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 438 kg more than 2009 Lada Kalina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (278 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada Kalina. (120 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada Kalina.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo 2009 Lada Kalina
Make Chevrolet Lada
Model Monte Carlo Kalina
Year Released 2004 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3392 cc 1595 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 180 HP 58 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 278 Nm 120 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1518 kg 1080 kg
Vehicle Length 5030 mm 4050 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2480 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.4 L/100km 7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 50 L