2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 348 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Monte Carlo | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3678 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1585 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1615 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.4 L/100km | 2.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 1.9 L/100km |
