2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (281 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. (180 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 539 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (353 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. (278 Nm). This means 2013 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Monte Carlo | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3392 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 278 Nm | 353 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 2057 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4684 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1798 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.4 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 13.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 85 L |