2004 Chevrolet S-10 vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet S-10 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,194 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet S-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet S-10 (118 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet S-10 should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet S-10 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet S-10 (190 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Chevrolet S-10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet S-10 | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | S-10 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2194 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2700 mm |
