2004 Chevrolet S-10 vs. 1999 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet S-10 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet S-10. (190 Nm). This means 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet S-10. 1999 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2004 Chevrolet S-10 has manual transmission. 2004 Chevrolet S-10 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet S-10 | 1999 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Chevrolet | Land Rover |
Model | S-10 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2194 cc | 4554 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2550 mm |