2004 Chevrolet S-10 vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet S-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet S-10 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 239 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet S-10. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet S-10.
Because 2004 Chevrolet S-10 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet S-10 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 340 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet S-10. (190 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet S-10.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet S-10 | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | S-10 | UTE |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2194 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |