2004 Chevrolet Silverado vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Silverado (300 HP) has 260 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Silverado should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 1085 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Silverado | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Silverado | Master RR |
Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 40 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2295 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 75 L |