2004 Chevrolet Silverado vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Silverado (300 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Silverado should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 1465 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Silverado (488 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Silverado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Silverado | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Silverado | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 488 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 95 mm |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2660 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6510 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4250 mm | 2700 mm |
