2004 Chevrolet Silverado vs. 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 120 kg more than 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Silverado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Silverado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Silverado | 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Silverado | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5963 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 104.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 99.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 2154 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 107 L |