2004 Chevrolet Silverado vs. 2012 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Silverado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Silverado would be higher. At 5,963 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Silverado (345 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2012 SsangYong Chairman W. (302 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Silverado should accelerate faster than 2012 SsangYong Chairman W.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Silverado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 SsangYong Chairman W. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Silverado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Silverado | 2012 SsangYong Chairman W | |
Make | Chevrolet | SsangYong |
Model | Silverado | Chairman W |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5963 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1495 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |