2004 Chevrolet Silverado vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Silverado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Silverado would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 1357 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Silverado (488 Nm) has 396 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Silverado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Silverado | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
| Model | Silverado | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 488 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 81 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2197 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 1867 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 33 L |
