2004 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1959 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,769 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Suburban (282 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1959 Ford Fairlane. (168 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 320 kg more than 1959 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Suburban | 1959 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Suburban | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2004 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5327 cc | 5769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2414 kg | 2094 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 5260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3000 mm |