2004 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1965 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Suburban (325 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1965 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1965 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 253 kg more than 1965 Lincoln Continental. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Suburban | 1965 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lincoln |
Model | Suburban | Continental |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 7048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 9 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2659 kg | 2406 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 142 L | 90 L |