2004 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 5,970 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Suburban (325 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 893 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Suburban (495 Nm) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Suburban | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Suburban | SSU |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5970 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2798 kg | 1905 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 142 L | 71 L |