2004 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 780 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Tahoe | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4807 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2260 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2760 mm |