2004 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1260 kg more than 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Tahoe | CLK GTR |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4807 cc | 4998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2260 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2680 mm |