2004 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2010 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2010 Holden Caprice is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe. (260 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe (393 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Caprice. (350 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Caprice.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2010 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Tahoe | Caprice |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4807 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 393 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
