2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 200 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Tracker | 6C |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 100 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 77 L |
