2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1950 Ford Zephyr
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1950 Ford Zephyr. (57 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1950 Ford Zephyr. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 155 kg more than 1950 Ford Zephyr. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Ford Zephyr. (151 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1950 Ford Zephyr | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Tracker | Zephyr |
Year Released | 2004 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 151 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 79.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 76.2 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 40 L |