2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1950 GAZ M-20
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1950 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1950 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 87 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 GAZ M-20. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 GAZ M-20. (126 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1950 GAZ M-20 | |
Make | Chevrolet | GAZ |
Model | Tracker | M-20 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1950 |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2120 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 126 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1373 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2710 mm |