2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP) has 114 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 330 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1950 Holden FX | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Tracker | FX |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2165 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2620 mm |
