2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1950 Jaguar MK V
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 3,485 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Jaguar MK V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1950 Jaguar MK V. (123 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1950 Jaguar MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jaguar MK V weights approximately 307 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Jaguar MK V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1950 Jaguar MK V | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
| Model | Tracker | MK V |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 3485 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1373 kg | 1680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2900 mm |
