2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 5 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Tracker | XK |
Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 3441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 290 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 106 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 63 L |