2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1952 Toyota SA
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Toyota SA would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1952 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1952 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 203 kg more than 1952 Toyota SA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1952 Toyota SA | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Tracker | SA |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1373 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2410 mm |
