2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1953 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1953 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Tracker | 12 M |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1620 mm |
