2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1957 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1957 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1957 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 270 kg more than 1957 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1957 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Tracker | CJ5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1957 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 145 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2060 mm |