2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1958 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP) has 125 more horse power than 1958 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1958 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 163 kg more than 1958 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1958 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Tracker | Master RR |
Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1451 cc |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 40 HP |
Vehicle Weight | 1373 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2540 mm |