2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC. (113 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC weights approximately 60 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC. (186 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Tracker | SC |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 186 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1360 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2830 mm |
