2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1959 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1959 Triumph Herald. (35 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 540 kg more than 1959 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Triumph Herald. (69 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1959 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Tracker | Herald |
Year Released | 2004 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 69 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 29 L |