2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1960 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Seven.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Lotus Seven. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1960 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | Tracker | Seven |
Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 29 L |