2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1964 DKW Munga
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 263 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1964 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | Tracker | Munga |
Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1373 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 31 L |