2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1964 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 388 kg more than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1964 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Tracker | 1500 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1318 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 40 L |