2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1965 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1965 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus Elan.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1965 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | Tracker | Elan |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1430 mm |