2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1966 NSU 1000
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1966 NSU 1000. (43 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1966 NSU 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 650 kg more than 1966 NSU 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 NSU 1000. (71 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 NSU 1000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1966 NSU 1000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | NSU |
Model | Tracker | 1000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 71 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 37 L |