2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1967 Ford GT 40
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 302 kg more than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1967 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Tracker | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 95.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 72.9 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 998 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2430 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 125 L |
